Comments on: Strange visual results, pseudo generative art?

By: H

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:42:51 +0000

Not an artist? My butt. This is great!

By: David

David — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:17:45 +0000

Naw, I wouldn’t go that far. For one, I don’t nearly have as much chest hair

By: makc

makc — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:56:46 +0000

ooh… that reminds me last king kong movie, when the monkey defeats three raptors, than just stands there for a while and finally walks away, like it doesnt really expect any appreciation.

By: David

David — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:08:40 +0000

Ah lol, didn’t get that But I have different reasons to think it’s not art – one of them being exactly the fact that I wasn’t really trying to express anything

By: makc

makc — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:22:08 +0000

I was actually thinking that you personally think your stuff is not good enoug to qualify as “art”; so my point was that it is art regardless.

By: David

David — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:37:51 +0000

Willem: Thx!

Makc: True enough, but for the record: I didn’t state art needs to be beautiful. Me not being an artist and me liking some of the results are two unrelated statements

Henner: Flickr, eh? I’ll think about it – don’t really feel the need to join another social medium

Rien: Correction: Tripple Whopper! That 50% more meat! Cheers!

By: Rien

Rien — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:06:59 +0000

Nice work David! It must have been the Double Whopper at Burger King which made you able to get this done! Those things are energy bombs

By: Henner

Henner — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:48:51 +0000

oh and please post these pictures on flickr in the group “generative and evolutionary art”!

By: Henner

Henner — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:48:00 +0000

maybe its not art but it is definitely design.. you will be a rich man.. or you can just share the code and make other people rich

By: makc

makc — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:57:34 +0000

art is not something beautiful (check out Hermann Nitsch), it is something that you do for self expression.