Comments on: (fake) 2D parallax mapping… will burn your cpu

By: kris

kris — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:18:12 +0000

guess i shouldve found your blog some while ago, very cool stuff!

By: David

David — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:51:41 +0000

Sure Timur, feel free

By: Timur I. Alhimenkov

Timur I. Alhimenkov — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:49:13 +0000

Good work! Thank you!
I always wanted to write in my blog something like that. Can I take part of your post to my blog?
Of course, I will add backlink?

Sincerely, Timur Alhimenkov

By: Paul Andre

Paul Andre — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:19:01 +0000

Thank you!Your site is very nice

==
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulandredevera

By: Parallax Mapping with Pixel Bender (still burning cpu’s) | Der Schmale - David Lenaerts's blog

Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:11:36 +0000

[...] « Home « (fake) 2D parallax mapping… will burn your cpu [...]

By: David

David — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:15:25 +0000

Hehe yeah, I’ve been looking forward to that as well, but nearly forgot about it! I guess it’s a good way to test my patience

By: Mr.doob

Mr.doob — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:43:26 +0000

Ah! I see I see We’ll have to wait for Joa’s hack then.
http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2008/09/08/pixelbender-runtime-compilation/

By: David

David — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:42:50 +0000

Hi Mr.doob I actually wanted to try out a version that would run on FP9 (that, and it was easier to do it using the DisplacementMapFilter to get a grip on the concept). I’ve been working on a Pixel Bender version tho, but I can’t get it just right… The pixel-perfect way of doing Parallax Mapping that can handle steep slopes apparently requires a conditional loop, but I hope I can somehow approximate the effect with hard-coded iterations

By: Mr.doob

Mr.doob — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:35:40 +0000

How come you didn’t do it with Pixel Bender instead?

By: David

David — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:24:07 +0000

I’d hope their newer version is faster, since (as far as I can tell) theirs a single-pass algorithm